🔗 Share this article

Via an per curiam decision, the nation's top court permitted Texas to employ a newly configured congressional map that is projected to include up to five new conservative-tilting districts. The six-to-three ruling, issued on Thursday, upholds a request by the state to overturn a federal judge's ruling that had invalidated the redistricting plan in November.

Court's Reasoning

The federal judge wrongly interjected itself into an active primary campaign, generating much confusion and upsetting the delicate equilibrium in elections, the order stated in justifying its ruling.

The federal court had earlier ruled that Texas had probably grouped voters based on their race – a act known as illegal race-based districting – when it passed the new maps. It had instructed the state to revert to the boundaries established after the most recent national count for the next year's election.

Sharp Opposition

Through a sharply worded objection, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the court's action. She stated that it undermined the work of the lower court, noting that its opinion was written by a judge appointed by ex-President Donald Trump.

While our court is superior in jurisdiction, we are not superior in making these fact-intensive determinations, Kagan stated in a opinion joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The justice went on, Today's ruling ensures that Texas's new map, with all its boosted partisan advantage, will govern next year's elections. And it ensures that many Texas residents, without justification, will be sorted in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has stated repeatedly, is a breach of the U.S. Constitution.

National Map-Drawing Fight

The ruling occurs during a national contest over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in pushes to transform the U.S. House map to secure a slim Republican hold. Typically, boundary revision occurs after a new decade's census. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a bold off-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer triggered a series of events among other states.

Conservative legislators in including North Carolina and Missouri have also approved new maps that could add a number of more GOP-friendly seats. Democrats, in response, have countered with revised boundaries in including California and Virginia, which could offset those potential gains.

Partisan Reactions

Lone Star State AG hailed the High Court's decision. In a statement, he said the order upheld Texas's prerogative to draw a map that guarantees representation supportive of his party. Our state is leading the charge to reclaim the nation, one district and one state at a time, he stated.

In contrast, Democratic representatives lamented the outcome. It is deeply disheartening that the Court has endorsed this severely racially gerrymandered plan from Texas Republicans, said the leader of a major Democratic campaign committee.

Another top Democratic figure said the court had once again eroded its standing by approving a racially gerrymandered map. This decision from the Court's far-right bloc proves extremists are willing to rig elections. The Texas map is a discriminatory power grab targeting Black and Latino voters, he stated.