🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue sets out a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Officials say it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing looking for treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline is situated the grave of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His parent said she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

The lack of consensus over when and how to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some are calling for more sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices argue the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.